6 August 2005

Consider the implications if the Bush administration escapes accountability

Paul Craig Roberts issues a scathing indictment of a "watchdog media" that is serving as propaganda shills for the Bush administration. After making the point that the current scandals dwarf those of Nixon, Reagan, and Clinton, he targets the concentration of media and its acquiescence to the corrupt powers in American government.
The executive branch will have established itself as above the law.

The executive, armed with a compliant media, will have war-making power subject only to successful PR spin. It means the final end of the people's right to declare war via elected representatives in Congress.

The few remaining restraints on the executive's ability to detain people indefinitely without charges will be removed. This power will silence the Internet.

Spiteful neighbors, employees, former spouses, whomever will gain the power to report any disliked person. The anti-terrorist apparatus needs victims to demonstrate its effectiveness, and as warrants, hearings, and evidence are no longer required, Americans will simply disappear like Soviet citizens in the Stalin era.

While it is debatable that mainstream media outlets have ever had a greater than rare thread of independence inherent in them (of recent note, see the story of a NY Times Pulitzer Prize winner, writing on the subject of Hiroshima atomic bombing, was actually on the payroll of the War department), Americans should be rightfully alarmed over the erosion of civil liberties, justified for the pursuit of the "global war on terror".

On the speculation of "silencing the Internet", note that broadband providers are becoming as concentrated as mainstream media and frequently pull the plug on any content deemed questionable, and it's definitely not a matter of "innocent until proven guilty". That, in conjunction with warrantless detentions could conceivably put a deep freeze on freedom of expression.

Comments

More from NOW on media consolidation:

http://www.pbs.org/search/r...
Naum,
Of interest on this subject, I just finished watching NOW on PBS, which intervewed Robert McChesney. Three weeks ago I finished reading the book "Into the Buzzsaw". The last chapter was incredible, also From the journalist Robert McChesney.

The full and expanded article can now be found on my web blog:

Introduction and the origins of professional “unbiased” journalism
http://www.livejournal.com/...

The Commercialization of Journalism
http://www.livejournal.com/...

But Wait, Don’t the Media Have a Liberal Bias?
http://www.livejournal.com/...

Footnotes
http://www.livejournal.com/...

===
McChesney article in the rich footnotes, mentions a book which expands on the history of where the entire idea of "unbiased" journalism got its origins:

Just the Facts: How "Objectivity" Came to Define American Journalism
by David T. Z. Mindich

http://www.amazon.com/exec/...
More on this weeks NOW broadcast:

http://www.pbs.org/now/this...
My modest section on the corporate media, including other NOW broadcasts:

http://www.livejournal.com/...

--------

My favorite quote of the article is this:

"the media do not necessarily tell your what to think, but they tell you what to think about, and how to think about it."

Notice how none of you, the "liberals" like yourself and the conservatives like Mondo rarely talk about economic issues? This is only one example of how the corporate media decides what we think about....

(Denying the label "liberal", unfortunatly a common practice among the left, is another conversation all together, which truly shows the failure of the left, and the victory of the right)