Conservative folklore
Can't remember now whether it was in high school or sometime in my first couple years of college when I first heard the argument that the New Deal didn't end the Depression.It was a long time ago, whenever it was, but that first time I heard it was far from the last. It was dismaying then that so many years after FDR there were people who could seriously argue the point and it's even more dismaying now that they're still arguing the point.
But then there are people who still argue that slavery wasn't so bad.
And anyway the South wasn't fighting to protect slavery, it was fighting for States' Rights.
Which rights?
Well, um, the right to permit slavery...
The the New Deal didn't work argument went---goes---Since at some unspecificed point a few years into FDR's first or second term the United States hadn't returned to the level of prosperity it supposedly enjoyed in 1928, nothing Roosevelt did had any real effect.
This comes out of an idea that has been a fundamental of conservative thought forever: Since there is no heaven on earth and no human endeavor is perfect and therefore Utopia is impossible, we might as well not bother trying to solve any problems, particularly if trying means having to spend my tax dollars.
At any rate, whenever I'd make the case that the point from which to begin measuring Roosevelt's success or failure should be 1931 or so, and if you do that you see that things are an awful lot better, on the whole, by 1938.
Yes, would come the insistent rebuttal, but he didn't end the Depression.
The problem I had and anyone with a real knowledge of history has with this argument is that it's true. Roosevelt didn't end the Depression. We don't believe that he did. He saved us from the worst of it, turned the economy around, and set us on a road that led to the great prosperity and stability of the 1950s. It took years for the country to recover. But what you're faced with here is the grade school text book version of history---the Happy Days Are Here Again three paragraph summation of the 1930s and 40s. Roosevelt ended the Depression and won World War II.
If the New Deal didn't end the Depression, what did?
Always, always, the person I was arguing with came back with: World War II.
World War II?
World War II.
Not the New Deal?
No.
So all the massive government spending programs and job programs didn't work?
Nope.
But World War II did?
Yep?
How?
By revitalizing American industries and putting everybody back to work!
Uh huh. And what was it, specifically, that revitalized those industries?
Orders for guns and planes and tanks and battleships, of course. There was a war on, duh!
I see. And who was the main customer for all the guns and planes and tanks and battleships?
Um, the Government.
And where did all those people go to work?
Um, the military.
Which means who paid their salaries?
The Government.
So massive Goverment spending and job programs didn't work but then a massive government spending and jobs program did?
Well, yeah. But it was different!
How so?
It just was!
Give me one way.
Well, we needed all that stuff during the war.
The guns and tanks and planes and battleships?
Exactly.
And we didn't need the roads and the schools and new post offices and dams and electrification programs?
Sputter. Sputter.
Here I would helpfully provide my opponent with the point that the good thing about planes, tanks, and battleships is that they get shot down, blown up, and sunk and have to be constantly replaced. You build a school and 30, 40, and even 50 years can by before you have to build another one.
In 1933, when Roosevelt took office, unemployment was at 25%. By 1941, the start of Roosevelt's third term, it shrunk to under 10%. Employment increased from 38 million in 1932, to 44 million in 1936, and in 1941 rose to over 50 million. While not all of FDR's New Deal initiatives were successful, his administration ushered in an era where the size of the middle class mushroomed, and an America where most all willing to work could provide for a family on one income.
Sadly, many blindly swallow the conservative revisionist reassessments, that go completely against the truth of the empirical economic numbers.